0.12/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.12/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 960
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 02:48:29 EDT 2022
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.47	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.19/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.19/0.47	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.19/0.47	eprover: eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.19/0.47	Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.19/0.47	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.19/0.47	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.19/0.47	eprover: Parsing a user given option argument: "(3.PNRefinedweight(PreferGoals,1,1,1,2,2,2,0.5),5.PNRefinedweight(PreferNonGoals,2,1,1,1,2,2,2),3.OrientLMaxWeight(PreferEasyHO,2,1,2,1,1),4.Diversityweight(DeferLambdas,1,1,1.5,1,1,-1.000000,0.000000,1.000000,1.000000)),1.FIFOWeight(ConstPrio),1.PNRefinedweight(PreferLambdas,2,1,1,1,2,2,2))":1:(Column 221):(just read ','): No token (probably EOF) expected, but Comma (',') read 
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting sh2lt with 480s (4) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# sh2lt with pid 27209 completed with status 0
0.19/0.48	# Result found by sh2lt
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting sh2lt with 480s (4) cores
0.19/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.19/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1
0.19/0.48	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 4 cores with 480 seconds (480 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 289s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine with 49s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 49s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting sh2lt with 49s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# ehoh_best6_lambda with pid 27214 completed with status 3
0.19/0.48	# Starting sh2l with 44s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# ehoh_best_sine with pid 27217 completed with status 0
0.19/0.48	# Result found by ehoh_best_sine
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting sh2lt with 480s (4) cores
0.19/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.19/0.48	# ...ProofStateSinE()=1/1
0.19/0.48	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF00-SHHFFMBN
0.19/0.48	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 4 cores with 480 seconds (480 total)
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best6_lambda with 289s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best_sine with 49s (1) cores
0.19/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.19/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.19/0.48	
0.19/0.48	# Proof found!
0.19/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.19/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_22, type, epred1_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_23, type, epred2_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_24, type, epred3_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_25, type, epred4_1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_26, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_27, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.19/0.48	thf(decl_28, type, esk3_0: $i > $o).
0.19/0.48	thf(cTHM120_2_pme, conjecture, ?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:((((?[X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X2 @ X3))&![X4:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X4 @ X4)))&![X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ X4 @ X6)<=((X1 @ X5 @ X6)&(X1 @ X4 @ X5)))))&?[X7:$i > $o, X8:$i > $o]:(~((X1 @ X7 @ X8))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cTHM120_2_pme)).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:((((?[X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X2 @ X3))&![X4:$i > $o]:((X1 @ X4 @ X4)))&![X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o, X6:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ X5 @ X6)&(X1 @ X4 @ X5))=>(X1 @ X4 @ X6))))&?[X7:$i > $o, X8:$i > $o]:(~(X1 @ X7 @ X8))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM120_2_pme])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X18:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o, X19:$i > $o, X20:$i > $o, X25:$i > $o, X26:$i > $o]:(((((X18 @ (epred3_1 @ X18) @ (epred4_1 @ X18))|(~(X18 @ X19 @ X20)|~(X18 @ (epred1_1 @ X18) @ (epred1_1 @ X18)))|(X18 @ X25 @ X26))&((X18 @ (epred2_1 @ X18) @ (epred3_1 @ X18))|(~(X18 @ X19 @ X20)|~(X18 @ (epred1_1 @ X18) @ (epred1_1 @ X18)))|(X18 @ X25 @ X26)))&(~(X18 @ (epred2_1 @ X18) @ (epred4_1 @ X18))|(~(X18 @ X19 @ X20)|~(X18 @ (epred1_1 @ X18) @ (epred1_1 @ X18)))|(X18 @ X25 @ X26)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ X4 @ X5)|~((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ X2 @ X3))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred2_1 @ X1) @ (epred3_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ X4 @ X5)|~((X1 @ X2 @ X3))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((((X2)=(X3))|((epred4_1 @ $eq)!=(epred2_1 @ $eq)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_3])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:((((epred3_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq))|((X2)=(X3)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_4])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X29:$i]:((((X2 @ X29)<=>(X3 @ X29))|((epred4_1 @ $eq)!=(epred2_1 @ $eq)))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $o, X4:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o, X1:($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o]:(((X1 @ (epred3_1 @ X1) @ (epred4_1 @ X1))|(X1 @ X4 @ X5)|~((X1 @ X2 @ X3))|~((X1 @ (epred1_1 @ X1) @ (epred1_1 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((epred3_1 @ $eq)=(epred2_1 @ $eq)), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o, X29:$i]:(((X2 @ X29)|((epred4_1 @ $eq)!=(epred2_1 @ $eq))|~((X3 @ X29)))), inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i > $o, X3:$i > $o]:(((X2)=(X3))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[])]), c_0_8])]), c_0_9]), c_0_5])).
0.19/0.48	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_11])])]), ['proof']).
0.19/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.19/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 1
0.19/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.19/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 3
0.19/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.19/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
0.19/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 25
0.19/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.19/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 3
0.19/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 20
0.19/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 21
0.19/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.19/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.19/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 7
0.19/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 121
0.19/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 88
0.19/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.19/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.19/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 29
0.19/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 15
0.19/0.48	# NegExts                              : 2
0.19/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 21
0.19/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.19/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.19/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 4
0.19/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
0.19/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.19/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
0.19/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 64
0.19/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 233
0.19/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.19/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 16
0.19/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25
0.19/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
0.19/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
0.19/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
0.19/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.19/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 57
0.19/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 19
0.19/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.19/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.19/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 9938
0.19/0.48	
0.19/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.48	# User time                : 0.010 s
0.19/0.48	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.19/0.48	# Total time               : 0.012 s
0.19/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1848 pages
0.19/0.48	
0.19/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.48	# User time                : 0.025 s
0.19/0.48	# System time              : 0.011 s
0.19/0.48	# Total time               : 0.037 s
0.19/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
0.19/0.48	EOF